Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Response of Wheat to Farmyard Manure and Zinc Application in a Vertisol of Central India

Megha Vishwakarma; G. S. Tagore; Indra Raj Yadav

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Zinc (Zn) deficiency is one of the major global nutrition concerns, particularly in regions where diets are cereal dominant. About 50% of soils poor in zinc have resulted in zinc deficiency in cereal grains. Farmyard manure (FYM) with Zn application is the way to meet the Zn needs of crops and to raise the Zn content of grain that is ultimately consumed by people. Therefore, a pot experiment was conducted at the Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry of JNKVV, Jabalpur, in the Rabi season of 2020-2021 with three levels of FYM (0, 5.0, and 10 t ha-1) and three levels of zinc (0, 5 and 10 kg Zn ha-1) through ZnSO4.7H2O in a completely randomized design (CRD). Results revealed that the addition of 5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1 produced significantly better results for the plant height compared to the control. The combined application of 10 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1 showed the highest SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development) meter reading at 21 DAS (Days after sowing), but it was the highest at the sole application of 10 t FYM ha-1 at 45 DAS. Significant enhancements in spike length (7.65 cm), weight and number of grains per spike (23.90), and DMP of 7.12 g pot-1 were recorded with the 5 kg Zn ha-1 sole application. However, the highest grain weight (2.50 g pot-1) was recorded with 5 t FYM ha-1 + 5 kg Zn ha-1, which was on par with 5 t FYM ha-1, 5 kg Zn ha-1, and 10 t FYM ha-1+10 kg Zn ha-1. The highest Zn content (48.95 mg kg-1) in wheat grain was recorded with 10 kg Zn ha-1, followed by 5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1 (44.45 mg kg-1). The highest Zn uptake of 99.53 µg pot-1 by grain of wheat was recorded with 5 t FYM ha-1 + 5 kg Zn ha-1, which was significantly superior to all the treatments but on par with 5 kg Zn ha-1 (98.82 µg pot-1). Combined application of 5 t FYM ha-1 +10 kg Zn ha-1 maintain extractable zinc in soil as compared to control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

5 t FYM plus 10 kg Zn per hectare significantly improved plant height over control.

Treatment
5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
e0

“the addition of 5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1 produced significantly better results for the plant height compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 t FYM plus 10 kg Zn per hectare gave the highest SPAD reading at 21 DAS.

Treatment
10 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1e0
Outcome
SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development) meter readinge0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
21 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combined application of 10 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1 showed the highest SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development) meter reading at 21 DAS (Days after sowing), but it was the highest at the sole application of 10 t FYM ha-1 at 45 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–1067 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole 10 t FYM per hectare gave the highest SPAD reading at 45 DAS.

Treatment
sole application of 10 t FYM ha-1e0
Outcome
SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development) meter readinge0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
45 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combined application of 10 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1 showed the highest SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development) meter reading at 21 DAS (Days after sowing), but it was the highest at the sole application of 10 t FYM ha-1 at 45 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–1067 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole 5 kg Zn per hectare significantly enhanced spike length.

Treatment
5 kg Zn ha-1 sole applicatione0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
enhancementse0
Value
7.65 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant enhancements in spike length (7.65 cm), weight and number of grains per spike (23.90), and DMP of 7.12 g pot-1 were recorded with the 5 kg Zn ha-1 sole application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole 5 kg Zn per hectare significantly enhanced weight.

Treatment
5 kg Zn ha-1 sole applicatione0
Outcome
weighte0
Direction
enhancementse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant enhancements in spike length (7.65 cm), weight and number of grains per spike (23.90), and DMP of 7.12 g pot-1 were recorded with the 5 kg Zn ha-1 sole application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole 5 kg Zn per hectare significantly enhanced number of grains per spike.

Treatment
5 kg Zn ha-1 sole applicatione0
Outcome
number of grains per spikee0
Direction
enhancementse0
Value
23.90e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant enhancements in spike length (7.65 cm), weight and number of grains per spike (23.90), and DMP of 7.12 g pot-1 were recorded with the 5 kg Zn ha-1 sole application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole 5 kg Zn per hectare significantly enhanced DMP.

Treatment
5 kg Zn ha-1 sole applicatione0
Outcome
DMPe0
Direction
enhancementse0
Value
7.12 g pot-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant enhancements in spike length (7.65 cm), weight and number of grains per spike (23.90), and DMP of 7.12 g pot-1 were recorded with the 5 kg Zn ha-1 sole application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

5 t FYM plus 5 kg Zn per hectare gave the highest grain weight.

Treatment
5 t FYM ha-1 + 5 kg Zn ha-1e0
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.50 g pot-1e0
Qualifier
on par with 5 t FYM ha-1, 5 kg Zn ha-1, and 10 t FYM ha-1+10 kg Zn ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest grain weight (2.50 g pot-1) was recorded with 5 t FYM ha-1 + 5 kg Zn ha-1, which was on par with 5 t FYM ha-1, 5 kg Zn ha-1, and 10 t FYM ha-1+10 kg Zn ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole 10 kg Zn per hectare gave the highest wheat grain Zn content.

Organ / stage
wheat graine0
Treatment
10 kg Zn ha-1e0
Outcome
Zn contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
48.95 mg kg-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest Zn content (48.95 mg kg-1) in wheat grain was recorded with 10 kg Zn ha-1, followed by 5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1 (44.45 mg kg-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

5 t FYM plus 10 kg Zn per hectare gave the next highest grain Zn content.

Organ / stage
wheat graine0
Treatment
5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1e0
Outcome
Zn contente0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
44.45 mg kg-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest Zn content (48.95 mg kg-1) in wheat grain was recorded with 10 kg Zn ha-1, followed by 5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1 (44.45 mg kg-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

5 t FYM plus 5 kg Zn per hectare gave the highest wheat grain Zn uptake.

Organ / stage
grain of wheate0
Treatment
5 t FYM ha-1 + 5 kg Zn ha-1e0
Outcome
Zn uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
99.53 µg pot-1e0
Qualifier
on par with 5 kg Zn ha-1 (98.82 µg pot-1)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest Zn uptake of 99.53 µg pot-1 by grain of wheat was recorded with 5 t FYM ha-1 + 5 kg Zn ha-1, which was significantly superior to all the treatments but on par with 5 kg Zn ha-1 (98.82 µg pot-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined FYM and Zn maintained soil extractable zinc compared with control.

Treatment
5 t FYM ha-1 +10 kg Zn ha-1e0
Outcome
extractable zinc in soile0
Direction
maintaine0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
e0

“Combined application of 5 t FYM ha-1 +10 kg Zn ha-1 maintain extractable zinc in soil as compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1776–1885 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

33 papers: 29 positive, 4 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    Wheat plants with low Mn or low Zn supply showed no growth differences from controls at the three harvests.

    Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat · 1994 · compared with controls (sufficient Zn and Mn)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. negative

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 123 positive, 11 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.