Paper · 2020 · Agriculture

Effect of Soil and Foliar Silicon Application on the Reduction of Zinc Toxicity in Wheat

Aleksandra Zajaczkowska; Jolanta Korzeniowska; Urszula Sienkiewicz-Cholewa

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
38
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare soil and foliar application of Si to relieve stress in wheat caused by excess Zn in the soil. Two pot experiments were carried out in which the soil was contaminated with zinc sulphate at the dose of 600 mg kg−1 Zn before sowing. Si was applied in the soil in the following doses 200 mg kg−1 and 400 mg kg−1 Si and as foliar spraying in concentrations 2 mM L−1 and 6 mM L−1 Si in the form of sodium silicate. The applied dose of Zn was toxic to wheat and caused a significant decrease in the biomass of shoots and roots. Soil application of Si reduced the negative effect of Zn on plants and significantly increased the biomass of the tested organs. The foliar application of Si did not reduce the decrease of plant biomass. Soil contamination with Zn caused a drastic increase in Zn concentration in shoots and roots, while Si applied in the soil significantly decreased this concentration. The increase in soil pH, which was caused by sodium silicate, also affected the decrease in Zn concentration in plants. The plants absorbed Si applied to the soil, which is indicated by an increase in the Si content in shoots compared to the control. In the case of foliar spraying, only a higher dose of Si increased its concentration in the plants. The application of Si in the soil, in contrast to foliar application, reduced the transfer of Zn from roots to shoots. The higher effectiveness of soil application of Si than foliar application in alleviating the toxicity of Zn was associated with both an increase in pH and a higher uptake of Si by plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess zinc significantly reduced shoot and root biomass.

Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
biomass of shoots and rootse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The applied dose of Zn was toxic to wheat and caused a significant decrease in the biomass of shoots and roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil silicon significantly increased organ biomass under zinc stress.

Treatment
Soil application of Sie0
Outcome
biomass of the tested organse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil application of Si reduced the negative effect of Zn on plants and significantly increased the biomass of the tested organs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon did not relieve the biomass reduction.

Treatment
foliar application of Sie0
Outcome
decrease of plant biomasse0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar application of Si did not reduce the decrease of plant biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc contamination greatly increased zinc in shoots and roots.

Treatment
Soil contamination with Zne0
Outcome
Zn concentration in shoots and rootse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil contamination with Zn caused a drastic increase in Zn concentration in shoots and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil silicon significantly decreased zinc in shoots and roots.

Treatment
Si applied in the soile0
Outcome
this concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si applied in the soil significantly decreased this concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium silicate raised soil pH and contributed to decreased plant zinc.

Treatment
sodium silicatee0
Outcome
Zn concentration in plantse0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in soil pH, which was caused by sodium silicate, also affected the decrease in Zn concentration in plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil silicon increased shoot silicon content relative to control.

Treatment
Si applied to the soile0
Outcome
Si content in shootse0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants absorbed Si applied to the soil, which is indicated by an increase in the Si content in shoots compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only the higher foliar silicon dose raised silicon concentration in plants.

Treatment
higher dose of Sie0
Outcome
its concentration in the plantse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only a higher dose of Si increased its concentration in the plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil silicon reduced zinc transfer from roots to shoots compared with foliar application.

Treatment
application of Si in the soile0
Outcome
transfer of Zn from roots to shootse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
foliar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of Si in the soil, in contrast to foliar application, reduced the transfer of Zn from roots to shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

81 papers: 74 positive, 7 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 347 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

silicon atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 32 positive, 2 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 58 positive, 3 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

307 papers: 273 positive, 34 negative or no effect

272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

303 papers more in this group

See all 307 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.