Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soil water deficits from flowering to the start of pod growth significantly reduced peanut pod yield by 17-25% relative to well-watered controls for all cultivars.

A claim from Physiological analysis of peanut cultivar response to timing and duration of drought stress · 1991

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil water deficits from flowering to the start of pod growth significantly reduced peanut pod yield by 17-25% relative to well-watered controls for all cultivars.

Treatment
Soil water deficits occurring during the flowering to the start of pod growth phase (R/I)e1
Outcome
pod yieldse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
17-25%e1
Comparator
well-watered control plots (I/I)e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peanut cultivar response to timing and duration of drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–91
e1

“Soil water deficits occurring during the flowering to the start of pod growth phase (R/I) significantly reduced pod yields (range, 17-25%) relative to the well-watered control plots (I/I) for all cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–653

Title

Physiological analysis of peanut cultivar response to timing and duration of drought stress

GC Wright; KT Hubick; GD Farquhar Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 1991. doi:10.1071/ar9910453

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-a6797d22f251d95ed5cecb7fc0614bc10c6f3991171ce198d9c63767062f73cf · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

drought · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

79 papers: 24 positive, 55 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this claim · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
    Groundnut experienced lower drought-induced yield reduction than cowpea and green gram.

    Global Synthesis of Drought Effects on Food Legume Production · 2015 · compared with legumes such as cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and green gram (Vigna radiate)

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

stage · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 29 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.