Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Local GА3 spraying had no negative yield aftereffect after three years.

A claim from Последействие применения гиббереллина на столовых сортах винограда · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Local GА3 spraying had no negative yield aftereffect after three years.

Taxon
table grape cultivarse1
Treatment
use of GА3 by the method of local spraying of inflorescencese0
Outcome
indicators of plant yielde0
Direction
does not have a negative aftereffecte0
Qualifier
after three years of use of the growth regulatore0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Verbatim

e0

“The use of GА3 by the method of local spraying of inflorescences does not have a negative aftereffect on the indicators of plant yield after three years of use of the growth regulator.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–945
e1

“table grape cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–113

Title

Последействие применения гиббереллина на столовых сортах винограда

Андрей ШТИРБУ; Наталия СИВАК SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología 2021

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-a714ccd8a77b2d56fdcd428ad0e6e9c507d75892a1dd46439bd762a1af38cd87 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

application · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

87 papers: 80 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 80 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.