Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The sequence of one hand weeding at 15 DAS, post-emergence quizalofop ethyl plus metribuzin, further hand weeding at 30 DAS gave the highest net return of 67723 ha-1.

A claim from INTEGRATED WEED MANAGEMENT IN FENUGREEK (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sequence of one hand weeding at 15 DAS, post-emergence quizalofop ethyl plus metribuzin, further hand weeding at 30 DAS gave the highest net return of 67723 ha-1.

Taxon
Trigonella foenum-graecum L.Trigonella foenum-graecumt0
Treatment
1 HW at 15 DAS followed by a tank mix of Quizalofop ethyl 0.020 kg ha-1 + Metribuzin 0.075 kg ha-1e2
Outcome
net returne2
Direction
higheste2
Value
67723 ha-1e2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INTEGRATED WEED MANAGEMENT IN FENUGREEK (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70
e2

“The treatment sequence that involved 1 HW at 15 DAS followed by a tank mix of Quizalofop ethyl 0.020 kg ha-1 + Metribuzin 0.075 kg ha-1 as post-emergence, subsequent HW at 30 DAS, led to the highest net return of 67723 ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1466

Title

INTEGRATED WEED MANAGEMENT IN FENUGREEK (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.)

A Rathod; J Modhvadia; P Tank; et al. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science 2023. doi:10.56726/irjmets47931

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-a729318db2fcf255a1dbc852ce319c7cdd6ca26b1f498dcc151a8fcd3c7c3235 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.