Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Paradigm with Pinoxaden gave the best grassy weed outcomes in Alexandria.

A claim from Combination of Halauxifen - Methyl + Florasulamwith Other Grassy Herbicides Against Complex Weed Flora in Wheat (Triticumaestivum) · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paradigm with Pinoxaden gave the best grassy weed outcomes in Alexandria.

Treatment
Paradigm combinations with Pyroxsulam and Pinoxadene0
Outcome
grassy weed mass, visual weed estimation and percentage of grassy seed headse0
Direction
beste0
Setting
Alexandria regione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticumaestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–130
e0

“the best efficacy on grassy weed mass, visual weed estimation and percentage of grassy seed heads were obtained from Paradigm combinations with Pyroxsulam and Pinoxaden only at tillering stage in Alexandria region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–972

Title

Combination of Halauxifen - Methyl + Florasulamwith Other Grassy Herbicides Against Complex Weed Flora in Wheat (Triticumaestivum)

S. Mahmoud; F. Soliman; M. Elsheik Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology /Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology 2016. doi:10.21608/jppp.2016.50561

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-a73ef0dfc0f9dd44f523f3c29a974ae07781719da5a63c3c1e8db4e16ce5b11d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

pinoxaden · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.