Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Water limitation did not significantly change total anthocyanin content in radish storage roots.

A claim from Responses of radish (Raphanus sativus) to drought stress · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water limitation did not significantly change total anthocyanin content in radish storage roots.

Organ / stage
storage rootse5
Treatment
water limitatione5
Outcome
total anthocyanin contente5
Direction
did not significantly influencee5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of water deficit on radish growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–70
e5

“Substantially, water limitation did not significantly influence total anthocyanin content, ABTS‐radical scavenging activity and total free phenolic compounds in storage roots, as well as the total free phenolic compounds in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1575

Title

Responses of radish (Raphanus sativus) to drought stress

F. Stagnari; A. Galieni; S. D'Egidio; et al. Annals of Applied Biology 2017. doi:10.1111/aab.12409

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-a95aa23e0910ebb8df98379e5281de624d5ec418952507f5b5f0bf21e9eeca1a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

drought · quality: phytochemicals · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.