Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pre-harvest foliar applications increased the number of fruits and fruit weight per tree compared with control

A claim from Improving Washington Navel Orange Fruits by Some Natural Pre-Harvest Foliar Applications A- Mineral Content, Yield and Fruit Quality · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-harvest foliar applications increased the number of fruits and fruit weight per tree compared with control

Taxon
Washington Navel Oranget0
Treatment
pre-harvest foliar applications with Putrescinee1
Outcome
number of fruits and weight kg per treee2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“Improving Washington Navel Orange Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40
e1

“by pre-harvest foliar applications with Putrescine at (2, 4 and 6 mM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–433
e2

“all foliar applications improved leaf mineral contents and increased yield as (number of fruits and weight kg per tree), average fruit weight compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1257

Title

Improving Washington Navel Orange Fruits by Some Natural Pre-Harvest Foliar Applications A- Mineral Content, Yield and Fruit Quality

Thanaa Ezz; Mahmoud Ali; Ekbal Ahmed; et al. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches/Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches 2015. doi:10.21608/jalexu.2015.161143

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-a986a52b60b3ea4cccfeda9b2e2bef38ea540c76f3e1b0cf70ae33bedf3acc5a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

putrescine · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 65 positive, 12 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

68 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.