Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Heat shock at 50 degrees C for 20 seconds or more gave at least 1.2 times higher antioxidant capacity than control.

A claim from Heat Shock Treatments Induce the Accumulation of Phytochemicals in Kale Sprouts · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat shock at 50 degrees C for 20 seconds or more gave at least 1.2 times higher antioxidant capacity than control.

Treatment
Heat shock treatments at $50^{\circ}C$ for 20 seconds or moree5
Outcome
antioxidants capacitye5
Direction
highere5
Value
1.2 timese5
Comparator
controle5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease in the fresh and dry weight of kale sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2041–2093
e5

“Heat shock treatments at $50^{\circ}C$ for 20 seconds or more showed at least 1.5 and 1.2 times higher total phenolic concentration and antioxidants capacity than control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2947–3131

Title

Heat Shock Treatments Induce the Accumulation of Phytochemicals in Kale Sprouts

Min-Jeong Lee; Sooyeon Lim; Jongkee Kim; et al. Horticultural Science and Technology 2012. doi:10.7235/hort.2012.12094

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-a9a33cbf969b62cde37f6c8bc6008cd1a8c31f27ad1d927f0d9705c382b97615 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

heat · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.