Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Quality indices of garlic declined as mineral N rose up to 120 kg N fed-1.

A claim from Effect of Mineral Nitrogen Fertilization and some Organic Materials on Garlic Yield and Soil Fertility under Different Irrigation Intervals · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quality indices of garlic declined as mineral N rose up to 120 kg N fed-1.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativume0
Treatment
increasing the application rate of mineral N fertilizer up to 120 kg N fed-1e6
Outcome
quality indicese6
Direction
declinede6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.) is one of the most important crops in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–70
e6

“On the other hand, quality indices declined with increasing the application rate of mineral N fertilizer up to 120 kg N fed-1, and accumulation of nitrate in bulbs increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1842–2015

Title

Effect of Mineral Nitrogen Fertilization and some Organic Materials on Garlic Yield and Soil Fertility under Different Irrigation Intervals

R. El-Dissoky; M. Gahwash Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2018. doi:10.21608/jssae.2018.35883

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-ab20df2fc0cd5eaac9e99b96c8c264b5492a2879b1fc5b255058824ca37fcdba · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: general · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.