Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Severe deficit irrigation caused substantial yield losses.

A claim from Evaluating the Effectiveness of Water-Saving Irrigation on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Production in China: A Meta-Analytical Approach · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe deficit irrigation caused substantial yield losses.

Treatment
severe deficit irrigation (<40%)e0
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“severe deficit irrigation (<40%) caused substantial yield losses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1002
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–87

Title

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Water-Saving Irrigation on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Production in China: A Meta-Analytical Approach

Jiayu Ma; Baozhong Yin; Cuijiao Jing; et al. Plants 2025. doi:10.3390/plants14182837

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-abd12d0b3eacaffcb4336aa904c551ee972563cc620c69bede990cdd5face60c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

191 papers in the same direction as this claim · 797 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.