Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T8 produced the highest number of spikes per plant, reported as 6.60.

A claim from Effect of zinc fortification on growth, yield and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under irrigated condition of Punjab · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 produced the highest number of spikes per plant, reported as 6.60.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
T8 (T4 + 0.2% foliar spray with zinc sulphate at heading stage)e0
Outcome
number of spikes per plante0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.60e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of spikes per plant (6.60), number of grains per spike (41.00), grain yield (5.30 t ha-1) and straw yield (6.43 t ha-1) were recorded significantly highest under the treatment T8 (T4 + 0.2% foliar spray with zinc sulphate at heading stage) as comparison to other treatments and was statistically at par with T6, T9 and T7 while the treatment T1 recorded significantly lowest grain and straw yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–1064
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–91

Title

Effect of zinc fortification on growth, yield and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under irrigated condition of Punjab

Shalini .; Atik Ahamad; Agyapal Singh; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i3d.9239

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-ac698fff2d8f3e6a4330fb20fd0cd4e37ae2c49f035be55d89951f0a89428eae · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this claim · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

868 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.