Intervention effectmodel-written summary

No-till had the lowest grain yield, 2.57 t ha-1.

A claim from Influence of different tillage practices and earthworm on selected soil physio-chemical parameters and yield of maize. · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till had the lowest grain yield, 2.57 t ha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.57 t ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117
e0

“Number of grains cob-1 (336) and grain yield (3.6 t ha-1) were the highest in CT while the lowest number of grains cob-1 (259) and grain yield (2.57 t ha-1) were recorded in NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–988

Title

Influence of different tillage practices and earthworm on selected soil physio-chemical parameters and yield of maize.

Abbas Safeer; Irfan Aziz; Tariq Mahmood; et al. Soil in the Environment 2013

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-ad53d2f2ce25e816e2735f7568dd11489a5cd93e9669881f4698fdb7eee789cc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this claim · 811 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Deep tillage increased maize yield components and harvest index relative to no tillage.

    Effects of tillage and intercropping with grass on soil properties and yield of rainfed maize. · 2008 · compared with no tillage

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    No-tillage was associated with higher corn yields.

    Influence of No‐tillage on Soil Moisture1 · 1971

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    CA improved maize grain yield, especially in two- or three-year rotations.

    ROTATION IN CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE SYSTEMS OF ZAMBIA: EFFECTS ON SOIL QUALITY AND WATER RELATIONS · 2010

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Subsoil tillage increased grain yield of spring maize by 12.8% on average compared with conventional soil treatment.

    Effect of subsoil tillage depth on nutrient accumulation, root distribution, and grain yield in spring maize · 2014 · compared with conventional soil treatment

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    In 1983 strip or no tillage with soybean rotation raised corn grain yield by 12%.

    Influence of Tillage and Crop Rotation on Yields of Corn, Soybean, and Wheat · 1988

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    In Lemu, CA monocrop maize yielded 2.7 Mg ha −1 more than conventional tillage in 2009/10.

    Conservation agriculture systems for Malawian smallholder farmers: long-term effects on crop productivity, profitability and soil quality · 2012 · compared with conventional tillage

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Tillage increased corn yields.

    Long-term crop rotation and tillage effects on soil greenhouse gas emissions and crop production in Illinois, USA · 2018 · compared with no-tillage

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    No-till gave a higher mean corn grain yield, 2.97 Mg ha −1, than moldboard plow-disk.

    Tillage Effects on Corn Production and Soil Physical Conditions · 1995 · compared with MP

    Opposite direction

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.