Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nanoparticle seed priming increased root development, leaf length, and total plant weight in oat at 30 and 90 days.

A claim from Field Crop Evaluation of Polymeric Nanoparticles of Garlic Extract–Chitosan as Biostimulant Seed Nano-Priming in Cereals and Transcriptomic Insights · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle seed priming increased root development, leaf length, and total plant weight in oat at 30 and 90 days.

Treatment
plants treated with nanoparticlese0
Outcome
root development, leaf length, and total plant weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at 30 and 90 dayse0
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biostimulant properties of the nano-priming agent were evaluated in a field experiment with wheat, barley, and oat seeds at 30 and 90 days, showing that plants treated with nanoparticles showed significant differences with higher values in root development, leaf length, and total plant weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–1062

Title

Field Crop Evaluation of Polymeric Nanoparticles of Garlic Extract–Chitosan as Biostimulant Seed Nano-Priming in Cereals and Transcriptomic Insights

María Mondéjar-López; Alberto José López-Jiménez; Lourdes Gómez-Gómez; et al. Polymers 2024. doi:10.3390/polym16233385

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-ae8b48e840dbb6891ea35959ac6bbc424dd351ffbedccae325d1e698c9c82f9e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.