Paper · 2024 · Polymers

Field Crop Evaluation of Polymeric Nanoparticles of Garlic Extract–Chitosan as Biostimulant Seed Nano-Priming in Cereals and Transcriptomic Insights

María Mondéjar-López; Alberto José López-Jiménez; Lourdes Gómez-Gómez; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Current crop management worldwide is shifting toward the use of environmentally friendly products. With this objective, we developed a new phytosanitary product with biostimulant properties based on the encapsulation of garlic extract at a lower dose (<0.1%) in chitosan nanoparticles as a seed nano-priming agent. In the present study, the morphology of the nanoparticles, their stability under prolonged storage conditions, and their efficacy as a biostimulant are evaluated on cereals in rainfed crops, and the activities were correlated with a transcriptomic analysis. The nanoparticles showed a spherical shape and had a maximum size close to 200 nm with satisfactory stability at 4 °C, reducing the probability of aggregation processes in the nanoparticles. The biostimulant properties of the nano-priming agent were evaluated in a field experiment with wheat, barley, and oat seeds at 30 and 90 days, showing that plants treated with nanoparticles showed significant differences with higher values in root development, leaf length, and total plant weight. Finally, through a RNA-SEQ analysis of the treated wheat seeds, we have confirmed that the nano-treatment showed a higher increases in regard to development, metabolism, and plant response genes compared with untreated seeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The garlic extract–chitosan nanoparticles were spherical and had a maximum size near 200 nm.

Outcome
spherical shapee0
Value
200 nme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The nanoparticles showed a spherical shape and had a maximum size close to 200 nm with satisfactory stability at 4 °C, reducing the probability of aggregation processes in the nanoparticles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–763 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nanoparticles were stable at 4 °C, with reduced aggregation probability.

Outcome
satisfactory stabilitye0
Direction
reducinge0
Setting
4 °Ce0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The nanoparticles showed a spherical shape and had a maximum size close to 200 nm with satisfactory stability at 4 °C, reducing the probability of aggregation processes in the nanoparticles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–763 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle seed priming increased root development, leaf length, and total plant weight in wheat at 30 and 90 days.

Treatment
plants treated with nanoparticlese0
Outcome
root development, leaf length, and total plant weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at 30 and 90 dayse0
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biostimulant properties of the nano-priming agent were evaluated in a field experiment with wheat, barley, and oat seeds at 30 and 90 days, showing that plants treated with nanoparticles showed significant differences with higher values in root development, leaf length, and total plant weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle seed priming increased root development, leaf length, and total plant weight in barley at 30 and 90 days.

Treatment
plants treated with nanoparticlese0
Outcome
root development, leaf length, and total plant weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at 30 and 90 dayse0
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biostimulant properties of the nano-priming agent were evaluated in a field experiment with wheat, barley, and oat seeds at 30 and 90 days, showing that plants treated with nanoparticles showed significant differences with higher values in root development, leaf length, and total plant weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle seed priming increased root development, leaf length, and total plant weight in oat at 30 and 90 days.

Treatment
plants treated with nanoparticlese0
Outcome
root development, leaf length, and total plant weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at 30 and 90 dayse0
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biostimulant properties of the nano-priming agent were evaluated in a field experiment with wheat, barley, and oat seeds at 30 and 90 days, showing that plants treated with nanoparticles showed significant differences with higher values in root development, leaf length, and total plant weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle treatment increased expression of development, metabolism, and plant response genes in wheat seeds relative to untreated seeds.

Organ / stage
seedse0
Treatment
nano-treatmente0
Outcome
development, metabolism, and plant response genese0
Direction
higher increasese0
Comparator
untreated seedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“through a RNA-SEQ analysis of the treated wheat seeds, we have confirmed that the nano-treatment showed a higher increases in regard to development, metabolism, and plant response genes compared with untreated seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1288 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 25 positive, 10 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

nanoparticle · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.