Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sequential glyphosate treatments gave at least 95% giant foxtail control.

A claim from Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and Annual Weed Control in Glyphosate-Resistant Field Corn (Zea mays)1 · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential glyphosate treatments gave at least 95% giant foxtail control.

Taxon
Field Cornt0
Treatment
sequential glyphosate treatmentse0
Interactor
giant foxtaile0weed
Outcome
giant foxtail controle0
Direction
or greatere0
Value
95%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“giant foxtail control was 95% or greater for sequential glyphosate treatments and treatments containing acetochlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–773
t0

“Field Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–95

Title

Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and Annual Weed Control in Glyphosate-Resistant Field Corn (Zea mays)1

DAVID W. FISCHER; R. GORDON HARVEY Weed Technology 2002. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2002)016[0482:ynceaa]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-aea2a1952dfba2bea559ecdbeb76d1b3904552c18b2dc2d06453516dc6aed949 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

glyphosate · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 36 positive, 5 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.