Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Maximum faba bean yield was obtained with 500 g Zn/ha as a foliar spray 8 weeks after sowing.

A claim from Critical plant and seed concentrations of phosphorus and zinc for predicting response of faba beans ( Vicia faba ) · 1996

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum faba bean yield was obtained with 500 g Zn/ha as a foliar spray 8 weeks after sowing.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
500 g Zn/ha as a foliar spray, 8 weeks after sowinge4
Outcome
Maximum yieldse4
Direction
Maximume4
Value
500 g Zn/hae4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“predicting response of faba beans ( Vicia faba )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–114
e4

“Maximum yields were obtained by either applying about 2 kg Zn/ha to the soil at sowing, or 500 g Zn/ha as a foliar spray, 8 weeks after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–746

Title

Critical plant and seed concentrations of phosphorus and zinc for predicting response of faba beans ( Vicia faba )

DC Lewis; WA Hawthorne Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1996. doi:10.1071/ea9960479

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-af0af0da5de830cc91849527a5439f6846fc63a7c554acd964ef39320a9542d2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

30 papers: 29 positive, 1 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

application · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 110 positive, 6 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.