Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T6 produced significantly greater total biomass than all other treatments in both years.

A claim from Evaluation of organic manures and fertilizers for enhancing yield and biomass of Chandrashoor in Himachal Pradesh · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 produced significantly greater total biomass than all other treatments in both years.

Taxon
Lepidium sativumLepidium sativume2
Treatment
integrated nutrient management (T6)e0
Outcome
total biomasse0
Direction
outperformede0
Value
37.40 → 32.28 q/hae0
Comparator
all treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lepidium sativum
Lepidium sativum · TaxonVikiçizer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integrated nutrient management (T6) significantly outperformed all treatments in every parameter: plant height (72.43 → 71.12 cm), branch number (14.76 → 11.46), straw yield (14.74 → 12.86 q/ha), seed yield (15.93 → 15.75 q/ha), and total biomass (37.40 → 32.28 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1138
t0

“Chandrashoor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93
e2

“in Lepidium sativum at Medicinal & Aromatic Plants Farm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–262

Title

Evaluation of organic manures and fertilizers for enhancing yield and biomass of Chandrashoor in Himachal Pradesh

Vipin Kumar; Krishna Kumar Patel; Pratyksh Pandey; et al. International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research 2025. doi:10.33545/26174693.2025.v9.i6k.4630

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-afb92f84d80a42e448276ff82f660d2cb9fcf49e4767d5976273830ccdd359c1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Lepidium sativumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.