Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The wider 75 x 30 cm spacing gave more sympodial branches per plant (17).

A claim from Performance of cotton genotype TCH 1819 to high density planting system under winter irrigated condition at the Western agroclimatic zone of Tamil Nadu · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The wider 75 x 30 cm spacing gave more sympodial branches per plant (17).

Treatment
wider spacing of 75 x 30 cme2
Outcome
sympodial branches per plante2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
17e2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to study the effect of row spacing on the growth and yield of cotton genotype TCH 1819”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–401
e2

“The number of sympodial branches per plant (17) and bolls per plant (22 bolls) was found significant in the wider spacing of 75 x 30 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1329

Title

Performance of cotton genotype TCH 1819 to high density planting system under winter irrigated condition at the Western agroclimatic zone of Tamil Nadu

R. Sowmiya; N. Sakthivel Journal of Applied and Natural Science 2021. doi:10.31018/jans.v13isi.2811

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-affb3e1ba49a00a2112451b7b8b03bf883fd33a9f89c6b8b3baefb8e78b00b45 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

density · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 39 positive, 7 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.