Claim · model-written summary
Authors recommend mycorrhizal inoculation to suppress S. rolfsii and M. incognita infection in soybean.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- mycorrhizal inoculatione0
- Interactor
- S. rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen - Second interactor
- M. incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Outcome
- suppress the incidence and severity of S. rolfsii and M. incognita infectione0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“mycorrhizal inoculation could be used as a bio-protective agent to suppress the incidence and severity of S. rolfsii and M. incognita infection in soybean”
Title
R.A. Bamigboye; O.K. Adekunle; A.O. Salami Ecologia 2020. doi:10.3923/ecologia.2020.86.92
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Soybean inoculated with Sclerotium rolfsii alone had higher disease incidence than mycorrhizal plants.
- Intervention effect Soybean inoculated with Meloidogyne incognita alone had higher disease incidence than mycorrhizal plants.
- Intervention effect Combined inoculation significantly reduced nematode population.
- Intervention effect M. incognita alone gave the highest nematode population at both sites.
- Observation Mycorrhiza-treated soil retained phosphorus and nitrogen.