Abstract
Background and Objective: There has been intriguing nutrient soil conservation status associated with mycorrhizal fungus associations with plants. The influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungus (AMF) Glomus mosseae on disease incidence and severity, nematode population and residual nutrient on soybean was investigated under both screenhouse and field conditions. This was with the view to providing information on the bio protective potential of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi. Materials and Methods: Inoculation of G. mosseae, S. rolfsii and M. incognita singly and simultaneously near root zones of soybean seedlings was carried out 2 weeks after planting. Symptomological characteristics were taken two weeks after inoculation till maturity. Soils samples were analyzed for nutrient and nematode population before planting and at harvest. Results: Soybean plants inoculated with either Sclerotium rolfsii or Meloidogyne incognita (pathogens) alone expressed higher disease incidence than mycorrhizal plants. The combined application of G. mosseae, S. rolfsii and M. incognita caused a significant reduction in nematode population while plants inoculated with M. incognita alone had the highest population in both sites of studies. Residual phosphorus and nitrogen were obtained in soil treated with mycorrhiza. Conclusion: This study shows that mycorrhizal inoculation could be used as a bio-protective agent to suppress the incidence and severity of S. rolfsii and M. incognita infection in soybean.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean inoculated with Sclerotium rolfsii alone had higher disease incidence than mycorrhizal plants.
- Taxon
- Soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- inoculated with either Sclerotium rolfsiie0
- Interactor
- Sclerotium rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen - Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- mycorrhizal plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soybean plants inoculated with either Sclerotium rolfsii or Meloidogyne incognita (pathogens) alone expressed higher disease incidence than mycorrhizal plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean inoculated with Meloidogyne incognita alone had higher disease incidence than mycorrhizal plants.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- Meloidogyne incognitae0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- mycorrhizal plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Soybean plants inoculated with either Sclerotium rolfsii or Meloidogyne incognita (pathogens) alone expressed higher disease incidence than mycorrhizal plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined inoculation significantly reduced nematode population.
- Treatment
- combined application of G. mosseae, S. rolfsii and M. incognitae0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. mosseae
Funneliformis mosseaee0symbiont - Outcome
- nematode populatione0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The combined application of G. mosseae, S. rolfsii and M. incognita caused a significant reduction in nematode population”
Claim · model-written summary
M. incognita alone gave the highest nematode population at both sites.
- Treatment
- inoculated with M. incognita alonee0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- populatione0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plants inoculated with M. incognita alone had the highest population in both sites of studies”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhiza-treated soil retained phosphorus and nitrogen.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Residual phosphorus and nitrogen were obtained in soil treated with mycorrhiza”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors recommend mycorrhizal inoculation to suppress S. rolfsii and M. incognita infection in soybean.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- mycorrhizal inoculatione0
- Interactor
- S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen
- Second interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- suppress the incidence and severity of S. rolfsii and M. incognita infectione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mycorrhizal inoculation could be used as a bio-protective agent to suppress the incidence and severity of S. rolfsii and M. incognita infection in soybean”
The same questions in other papers
Meloidogyne incognita · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Agroathelia rolfsii · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
Funneliformis mosseae · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →inoculation · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →inoculation · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
123 papers more in this group
See all 127 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.