Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T7 produced maximum yield (9.49 t/ha), followed by T5.

A claim from Effect of integrated nutrient management (INM) on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and soil fertility in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) cv. Pusa A-4 · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 produced maximum yield (9.49 t/ha), followed by T5.

Taxon
okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench)Abelmoschus esculentust0
Treatment
RDF (75%) + (25%) N through neem oil cake (T7)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
9.49 t/hae0
Comparator
T5e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was observed that application of RDF (75%) + (25%) N through neem oil cake (T7) produced maximum plant height (131.40 cm), number of leaves/plant (19.68), leaf area (324.68cm2), minimum days to first flowering (32.1), minimum days to 50% flowering (41.8), minimum days to first harvest (37.6), maximum number of fruits/ plant (14.42) and maximum yield (9.49 t/ha) and followed by T5 where RDF (75%) + (25%) N through vermicompost was applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–690
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–144

Title

Effect of integrated nutrient management (INM) on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and soil fertility in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) cv. Pusa A-4

Babita Mishra; GS Sahu; P. Tripathy; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2019

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-b00c19bcd6d83535e0ded843f2ff439a4878a59672225f2646fb16d85d12ed97 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

botanical · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results differ

78 papers: 69 positive, 9 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

354 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

364 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.