Intervention effectmodel-written summary

GA3 at 100 ppm foliar spray gave the maximum dry weight of onion plants (12.11 g).

A claim from Effect of Plant Growth Regulators and their Methods of Application on Growth of kharif Onion (Allium cepa L.) cv Agrifound Dark Red · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 100 ppm foliar spray gave the maximum dry weight of onion plants (12.11 g).

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepae0
Material
Agrifound Dark Rede0
Treatment
GA3 @ 100 ppm-foliar spraye1
Outcome
dry weight of plante1
Direction
maximume1
Value
12.11 ge1
Qualifier
at 80 days after transplantinge1
Setting
field of the nurserye0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in field of the nursery, Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Indore during Kharif season, 2017-2018 to see the effect of plant growth regulators and their methods of application on growth of kharif onion (Allium cepa L.) cv. Agrifound Dark Red during 2017 and result have shown significant differences among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–418
e1

“The maximum (48.03) plant height and number of leaves, leaf length (41.53 cm), leaf width (1.63 cm), leaf area (428.53 cm2), pseudostem length (9.03 cm), fresh weight of plant (57.43g), dry weight of plant (12.11 g) were recorded under T3 (GA3 @ 100 ppm-foliar spray) at 80 days after transplanting (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–724

Title

Effect of Plant Growth Regulators and their Methods of Application on Growth of kharif Onion (Allium cepa L.) cv Agrifound Dark Red

Bhanuja Dwivedi; Garima Diwan; K. P. Asati International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.809.183

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-b01ee964e495d355bcc4408f437b82c1d02e52b31ec98e9bde5965c335e23ed7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

Gibberellic acid · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

application · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 70 positive, 4 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.