Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The two combinations increased yield by 1,58 and 1,68 t/ha versus the fertilizer background.

A claim from Influence of limestone ameliorants and fertilizers on the winter wheat productivity in crop rotation · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two combinations increased yield by 1,58 and 1,68 t/ha versus the fertilizer background.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
1,5 doses and 1,0 doses dolomite flour in combination with S40 and microfertilizere2
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
1,58 and 1,68 t/hae0
Comparator
background (N120P60K90)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to the background (N120P60K90) – 1,58 and 1,68 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1713
e1

“The yield increase to the control (without fertilizers) was 2,61 and 2,71 t/ha, to the background (N120P60K90) – 1,58 and 1,68 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1713
e2

“1,5 doses and 1,0 doses dolomite flour in combination with S40 and microfertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1548
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70

Title

Influence of limestone ameliorants and fertilizers on the winter wheat productivity in crop rotation

V. M. Poliovyi; L. A. Yashchenko; H. F. Rovna; et al. Collected Works of Uman National University of Horticulture 2021. doi:10.31395/2415-8240-2021-98-1-58-67

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-b07bc42e95d8af4722a25cd5c91581a9f35968a0f945528a34a7b885e9ca1a53 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 140 positive, 33 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

164 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.