Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sulfur and two foliar Nutrivant Plus Cereals applications increased yield by 8%.

A claim from Influence of limestone ameliorants and fertilizers on the winter wheat productivity in crop rotation · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur and two foliar Nutrivant Plus Cereals applications increased yield by 8%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
spring tillering phase and stem elongatione0
Treatment
sulfur fertilizers (S40) and two-time foliar feeding with Nutrivant Plus Cereals (2 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
8%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of sulfur fertilizers (S40) and two-time foliar feeding with Nutrivant Plus Cereals (2 kg/ha) during the spring tillering phase and stem elongation provided an 8% increase in yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1909
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70

Title

Influence of limestone ameliorants and fertilizers on the winter wheat productivity in crop rotation

V. M. Poliovyi; L. A. Yashchenko; H. F. Rovna; et al. Collected Works of Uman National University of Horticulture 2021. doi:10.31395/2415-8240-2021-98-1-58-67

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-967f4efc3e7bc95e42f7cf8758f332aa17b61147d0b1a0d6f6ac4dd6c134a108 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Sulfur application yielded hardly any benefit.

    Landscape positions dictating crop fertilizer responses in wheat-based farming systems of East African Highlands · 2020

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Sulphur fertiliser had little effect on grain yield or grain nitrogen and sulphur concentration and uptake.

    Management of nitrogen and sulphur fertiliser for improved bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) quality · 2001

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Sulfur rate, source and timing did not affect yield on soils with SOM above 20 g kg −1.

    Do Hard Red Spring Wheat Varieties Vary in Their Response to Sulfur? · 2019

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Sulfur did not increase winter wheat grain yield at any site.

    In‐Season Application of Nitrogen and Sulfur in Winter Wheat · 2019

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Sulfur source treatments had a nonsignificant residual effect on wheat grain yield.

    Effect of Direct and Residual Effects of Different Sulfur Fertilizers on Groundnut and Wheat Cropping System on Typic Haplaquent Soils · 2003

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Sulfur reduced lentil and wheat yields.

    Evaluation of soil pH manipulation on crop production in northern idaho · 1986

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Zinc and sulfur treatments did not affect wheat biomass production or yield.

    Increasing the supply of sulphur increases the grain zinc concentration in bread and durum wheat · 2009

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Additional S fertilizer produced no observed winter wheat yield response at any location.

    On‐Farm Winter Wheat Response to Nitrogen‐, Phosphorus‐, Potassium‐, and Sulfur‐Rich Strips in Oklahoma · 2017 · compared with farmer's fertility practice

    Opposite direction

139 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Nutrient enrichment did not significantly affect seven-day hydroponic wheat fodder yield.

    Impact of Slope of Growing Trays on Productivity of Wheat Green Fodder by a Nutrient Film Technique System · 2020

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Urea+micronutrients did not change grain yield.

    Influence of Crop Management Practices on Physiologic Leaf Spot of Winter Wheat · 1993

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Micronutrient treatments did not influence wheat grain yield at most field locations.

    Agronomic biofortification of genetically biofortified wheat genotypes with zinc, selenium, iodine, and iron under field conditions · 2024

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Seed treatment did not influence wheat grain yield.

    Seed treatment and its impact on wheat crop yield potential · 2017

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    wheat biomass yield was not significantly influenced by micronutrient placement.

    Bioavailability, Speciation, and Crop Responses to Copper, Zinc, and Boron Fertilization in South-Central Saskatchewan Soil · 2022

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Micronutrients (Zn, Cu, Fe and Mn) had no significant effect on wheat yield.

    Maximizing wheat yield through integrated use of farmyard manure and fertilizers · 2016

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Half the recommended NPK with micronutrients and manure gave yields similar to the full fertilizer treatment.

    Understanding factors influencing wheat productivity in Ethiopian highlands · 2022 · compared with the full fertilizer treatment

    No difference from an alternative

  8. positive
    Late foliar micronutrients increased pollen viability, fertile spikes, and grains per spike under drought.

    Alleviation of drought stress in winter wheat by late foliar application of zinc, boron, and manganese · 2012

    Same direction

69 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this claim · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Current high nitrogen practices do not significantly raise crop yields relative to optimum fertilization.

    Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems · 2009 · compared with knowledge-based optimum N fertilization

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Wheat yield declined by 0.04 Mg ha −1 yr −1 with 75 and 100% N-P-K fertilizer.

    Yield and Soil Nutrient Changes in a Long‐Term Rice‐Wheat Rotation in India · 2002

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    The authors concluded that N fertiliser could not compensate for the yield reduction in canola and wheat due to late sowing.

    Effects of sowing time and nitrogen fertiliser on canola and wheat, and nitrogen fertiliser on Indian mustard. I. Dry matter production, grain yield, and yield components · 2001

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Genetic gain in winter wheat yield without fertiliser N was 0.021 t ha −1 y −1, smaller than at 215–250 kg/ha N.

    Responses of grain yield, biomass and harvest index and their rates of genetic progress to nitrogen availability in ten winter wheat varieties · 2006 · compared with 215–250 kg/ha N

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    The fertilizing substances did not significantly change plant yields.

    The influence of chlorothalonil on the activity of soil microorganisms and enzymes · 2018

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Compost did not significantly affect wheat grain yield, biomass or harvest index.

    Responses of Wheat Yield, Macro- and Micro-Nutrients, and Heavy Metals in Soil and Wheat following the Application of Manure Compost on the North China Plain · 2016

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Wheat yields were similar in fertilized fallow and unfertilized green-manure plots.

    Wheat Yields, Nitrogen Uptake, and Soil Moisture Following Winter Legume Cover Crop vs. Fallow · 1998 · compared with unfertilized plots following a green manure crop

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Incorporation timing of feedlot cattle manure had no impact on soil or crop performance.

    Effect of rate, frequency and incorporation of feedlot cattle manure on soil nitrogen availability, crop performance and nitrogen use efficiency in east-central Saskatchewan · 2004

    Opposite direction

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.