Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Bentazon plus acifluorfen controlled Ipomoea species above 90%.

A claim from Economic assessment of diclosulam and flumioxazin in strip- and conventional-tillage peanut · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bentazon plus acifluorfen controlled Ipomoea species above 90%.

Treatment
bentazon plus acifluorfen POSTe0
Interactor
Ipomoea speciesIpomoeae0weed
Outcome
Ipomoea speciese0
Direction
controle0
Value
> 90%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Ipomoea
Ipomoea · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Tauʻolunga · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three Ipomoea species (59 to 91%) and bentazon plus acifluorfen POST provided > 90% control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–701
t0

“strip- and conventional-tillage peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–91

Title

Economic assessment of diclosulam and flumioxazin in strip- and conventional-tillage peanut

Scott B. Clewis; Shawn D. Askew; John W. Wilcut Weed Science 2002. doi:10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0378:eaodaf]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-b085f2aaa3199305c6bcb97d5c23a9f3f658b1ada161c5e0e6786f92e052f573 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

acifluorfen · Ipomoea · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

bentazone · Ipomoea · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · Ipomoea · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.