Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Yuyuan fertilizer produced sugarcane yield of 108705 kg/hm2, significantly above other treatments.

A claim from The Application of Microbial Fertilizer Formulated for Sugarcane · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yuyuan fertilizer produced sugarcane yield of 108705 kg/hm2, significantly above other treatments.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Yuyuan microbial fertilizere0
Outcome
sugarcane yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
108705 kg/hm2e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment appling Yuyuan microbial fertilizer created a sugarcane yield of 108705 kg/hm2 and a sugar output of 18015 kg/hm2,which were significant higher than that of the other treatments in 1%statistical level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–432

Title

The Application of Microbial Fertilizer Formulated for Sugarcane

Qinghong Li Sugarcane and Canesugar 2010

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-b0c034e868c6432c214177c9898eeed1de9ebf97bd35117cd3bbce8d743f0c02 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Fertilization did not increase yields when mill mud was added to plant cane.

    Sugarcane Response to Mill Mud, Fertilizer, and Soybean Nutrient Sources on a Sandy Soil · 2008

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Excess nitrogen lowered sugarcane yield.

    Different Amounts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Applications Alter the Bacterial Diversity and Community Structure in the Rhizosphere Soil of Sugarcane · 2021

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Subsoil and within-row compost did not affect cane or sugar yield versus control.

    Gypsum and Compost Effects on Sugarcane Root Growth, Yield, and Plant Nutrients · 2002 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Magnesium fertilization did not affect yield at the reported soil magnesium level.

    Water and Nitrogen Management of Sugarcane Grown on Sandy, High‐Water‐Table Soil · 1998

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilization did not increase sugarcane agricultural productivity.

    Productivity and technological quality of sugarcane under fertilization of nitrogen and molybdenum · 2018

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Planting fertilizer percentages did not increase productivity at Morrinhos-GO.

    Yield and biometry of fertilized sugar cane with organomineral fertilizer of sewage sludge and biostimulant · 2020

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Zero nitrogen in the first fertilization would substantially reduce sugarcane yield in all seasons.

    Nitrogen Leaching and Nitrogen Balance under Differing Nitrogen Fertilization for Sugarcane Cultivation on a Subtropical Island · 2021

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Sugarcane yield did not respond to potassium fertiliser above the basal rate.

    Potassium management for sugarcane on base saturated soils in northern New South Wales · 2009 · compared with basal rate

    Opposite direction

337 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.