Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield under irrigation at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio did not differ significantly from 0.9 IW/CPE ratio (21.51 q/ha).
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- irrigation at 0.75 IW/CPE ratioe7
- Outcome
- grain yielde7
- Direction
- not significante7
- Value
- 21.51 q ha-1e7
- Comparator
- 0.9 IW/CPE ratioe6
- Setting
- Rahurie1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield of chickpea”
e1“Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar (M.S.) India”
e6“The irrigation applied at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio produced significantly superior grain yield (23.35 q ha-1) over other irrigation treatments”
e7“the difference with surface irrigation at 50 mm CPE (22.80 q ha-1) and irrigation at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio (21.51 q ha-1) grain yield was not significant”
Title
Influence of different irrigation scheduling through micro sprinkler on growth and yield of chickpea
AD Khot; SK Dingre; SS Patil International Journal of Chemical Studies 2021. doi:10.22271/chemi.2021.v9.i1aq.11699
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect Irrigation at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio significantly increased plant height, plant spread and branch number of chickpea.
- Intervention effect Irrigation at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio significantly increased dry matter accumulation of chickpea.
- Intervention effect Pod weight, seed weight and test weight of chickpea were significantly higher at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio than other treatments.
- Association Grain yield of chickpea increased with irrigation depth expressed as IW/CPE ratio.
- Intervention effect Grain yield at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio was significantly superior to other irrigation treatments, at 23.35 q/ha.
- Intervention effect Grain yield under surface irrigation at 50 mm CPE did not differ significantly from 0.9 IW/CPE ratio (22.80 q/ha).
- Intervention effect Growth of chickpea under 0.75 IW/CPE ratio micro-sprinkler irrigation was at par with 0.9 IW/CPE ratio.
- Intervention effect Growth of chickpea under surface irrigation at 50 mm CPE was at par with 0.9 IW/CPE ratio.
- Intervention effect Grain yield at 0.3 IW/CPE ratio was the lowest of all treatments, at 16.13 q/ha, attributed to insufficient soil moisture.
- Observation Total irrigation water used at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio was 253 mm.
- Association Water use efficiency decreased as the IW/CPE ratio increased.
- Intervention effect Net monetary returns and B:C ratio were highest under surface irrigation.
- Recommendation Growing chickpea with surface irrigation scheduling is beneficial for higher productivity and B:C ratio.
- Recommendation Micro-sprinkler irrigation at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio can be advisable for chickpea cultivation in semi-arid areas.
- Recommendation Under water scarcity, micro-sprinkler irrigation at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio is better in practice.