Abstract
A Field experiment entitled, “Influence of different irrigation scheduling through micro-sprinkler on growth and yield of chickpea” was conducted at the farm of All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Pulses Improvement Project, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar (M.S.) India during the Rabi season 2017-18. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with six irrigation treatments replicated four times. The treatments were consisting of applying irrigation through micro sprinkler at 0.3, 0.45, 0.6, 0.75 and 0.9 IW/CPE ratio, irrigation at 25 CPE and applying surface irrigation at 50 CPE. The growth in terms of plant height, plant spread, number of branches per plant and dry matter accumulation were observed to be significantly more in treatment of irrigation at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio. However surface irrigation at 50 mm CPE and 0.75 IW/CPE ratio with micro-sprinkler were at par with 0.9 IW/CPE ratio. Similarly, the yield contributing characters viz., weight of pods per plant, weight of seeds per plant, test weight were significantly higher in 0.9 IW/CPE ratio irrigation as compared to other treatments. The grain yield increased with increase in irrigation depth with IW/CPE ratio. The irrigation applied at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio produced significantly superior grain yield (23.35 q ha-1) over other irrigation treatments but the difference with surface irrigation at 50 mm CPE (22.80 q ha-1) and irrigation at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio (21.51 q ha-1) grain yield was not significant. The irrigation through micro sprinkler at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio can be advisable for chickpea cultivation in semi-arid area. The grain yield at lower 0.3 IW/CPE ratio (16.13 q ha-1) was lowest among all the treatments due to insufficient soil moisture and its distribution in root zone under inadequate depth (7.5 mm). The total irrigation water used in 0.75 IW/CPE ratio was (253 mm). The water use efficiency decreased with increase in IW/CPE ratio. The net monetary returns and B:C ratio was highest in surface irrigation. Based on the above findings, it could be concluded that growing of chickpea with irrigation scheduling at surface irrigation was beneficial for achieving higher productivity and B:C ratio. Nevertheless, under water scarcity condition micro sprinkler at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio better in practice.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio significantly increased plant height, plant spread and branch number of chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- 0.9 IW/CPE ratioe2
- Outcome
- plant height, plant spread, number of branches per plante2
- Direction
- moree2
- Setting
- Rahurie1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield of chickpea”
e1“Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar (M.S.) India”
e2“The growth in terms of plant height, plant spread, number of branches per plant and dry matter accumulation were observed to be significantly more in treatment of irrigation at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio significantly increased dry matter accumulation of chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- 0.9 IW/CPE ratioe2
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulatione2
- Direction
- moree2
- Setting
- Rahurie1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield of chickpea”
e1“Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar (M.S.) India”
e2“The growth in terms of plant height, plant spread, number of branches per plant and dry matter accumulation were observed to be significantly more in treatment of irrigation at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
Pod weight, seed weight and test weight of chickpea were significantly higher at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio than other treatments.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- 0.9 IW/CPE ratioe4
- Outcome
- weight of pods per plant, weight of seeds per plant, test weighte4
- Direction
- significantly highere4
- Comparator
- other treatmentse4
- Setting
- Rahurie1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield of chickpea”
e1“Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar (M.S.) India”
e4“the yield contributing characters viz., weight of pods per plant, weight of seeds per plant, test weight were significantly higher in 0.9 IW/CPE ratio irrigation as compared to other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield of chickpea increased with irrigation depth expressed as IW/CPE ratio.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- irrigation depth with IW/CPE ratioe5
- Outcome
- grain yielde5
- Direction
- increasede5
- Setting
- Rahurie1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield of chickpea”
e1“Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar (M.S.) India”
e5“The grain yield increased with increase in irrigation depth with IW/CPE ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio was significantly superior to other irrigation treatments, at 23.35 q/ha.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- 0.9 IW/CPE ratioe6
- Outcome
- grain yielde6
- Direction
- significantly superiore6
- Value
- 23.35 q ha-1e6
- Comparator
- other irrigation treatmentse6
- Setting
- Rahurie1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield of chickpea”
e1“Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar (M.S.) India”
e6“The irrigation applied at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio produced significantly superior grain yield (23.35 q ha-1) over other irrigation treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield under surface irrigation at 50 mm CPE did not differ significantly from 0.9 IW/CPE ratio (22.80 q/ha).
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- surface irrigation at 50 mm CPEe7
- Outcome
- grain yielde7
- Direction
- not significante7
- Value
- 22.80 q ha-1e7
- Comparator
- 0.9 IW/CPE ratioe6
- Setting
- Rahurie1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield of chickpea”
e1“Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar (M.S.) India”
e6“The irrigation applied at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio produced significantly superior grain yield (23.35 q ha-1) over other irrigation treatments”
e7“the difference with surface irrigation at 50 mm CPE (22.80 q ha-1) and irrigation at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio (21.51 q ha-1) grain yield was not significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield under irrigation at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio did not differ significantly from 0.9 IW/CPE ratio (21.51 q/ha).
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- irrigation at 0.75 IW/CPE ratioe7
- Outcome
- grain yielde7
- Direction
- not significante7
- Value
- 21.51 q ha-1e7
- Comparator
- 0.9 IW/CPE ratioe6
- Setting
- Rahurie1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield of chickpea”
e1“Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar (M.S.) India”
e6“The irrigation applied at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio produced significantly superior grain yield (23.35 q ha-1) over other irrigation treatments”
e7“the difference with surface irrigation at 50 mm CPE (22.80 q ha-1) and irrigation at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio (21.51 q ha-1) grain yield was not significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth of chickpea under 0.75 IW/CPE ratio micro-sprinkler irrigation was at par with 0.9 IW/CPE ratio.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- 0.75 IW/CPE ratioe3
- Outcome
- growthe2
- Direction
- at pare3
- Comparator
- 0.9 IW/CPE ratioe3
- Setting
- Rahurie1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield of chickpea”
e1“Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar (M.S.) India”
e2“The growth in terms of plant height, plant spread, number of branches per plant and dry matter accumulation were observed to be significantly more in treatment of irrigation at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio”
e3“surface irrigation at 50 mm CPE and 0.75 IW/CPE ratio with micro-sprinkler were at par with 0.9 IW/CPE ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth of chickpea under surface irrigation at 50 mm CPE was at par with 0.9 IW/CPE ratio.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- surface irrigation at 50 mm CPEe3
- Outcome
- growthe2
- Direction
- at pare3
- Comparator
- 0.9 IW/CPE ratioe3
- Setting
- Rahurie1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield of chickpea”
e1“Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar (M.S.) India”
e2“The growth in terms of plant height, plant spread, number of branches per plant and dry matter accumulation were observed to be significantly more in treatment of irrigation at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio”
e3“surface irrigation at 50 mm CPE and 0.75 IW/CPE ratio with micro-sprinkler were at par with 0.9 IW/CPE ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield at 0.3 IW/CPE ratio was the lowest of all treatments, at 16.13 q/ha, attributed to insufficient soil moisture.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- 0.3 IW/CPE ratioe2
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- loweste2
- Value
- 16.13 q ha-1e2
- Qualifier
- insufficient soil moisturee2
- Comparator
- all the treatmentse2
- Setting
- Rahurie1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield of chickpea”
e1“Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar (M.S.) India”
e2“The grain yield at lower 0.3 IW/CPE ratio (16.13 q ha-1) was lowest among all the treatments due to insufficient soil moisture”
Claim · model-written summary
Total irrigation water used at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio was 253 mm.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- 0.75 IW/CPE ratioe2
- Outcome
- total irrigation water usede2
- Value
- 253 mme2
- Setting
- Rahurie1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield of chickpea”
e1“Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar (M.S.) India”
e2“The total irrigation water used in 0.75 IW/CPE ratio was (253 mm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Water use efficiency decreased as the IW/CPE ratio increased.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- increase in IW/CPE ratioe2
- Outcome
- water use efficiencye2
- Direction
- decreasede2
- Setting
- Rahurie1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield of chickpea”
e1“Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar (M.S.) India”
e2“The water use efficiency decreased with increase in IW/CPE ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
Net monetary returns and B:C ratio were highest under surface irrigation.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- surface irrigatione2
- Outcome
- net monetary returns and B:C ratioe2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Setting
- Rahurie1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield of chickpea”
e1“Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar (M.S.) India”
e2“The net monetary returns and B:C ratio was highest in surface irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Growing chickpea with surface irrigation scheduling is beneficial for higher productivity and B:C ratio.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- irrigation scheduling at surface irrigatione2
- Outcome
- higher productivity and B:C ratioe2
- Setting
- Rahurie1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield of chickpea”
e1“Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar (M.S.) India”
e2“growing of chickpea with irrigation scheduling at surface irrigation was beneficial for achieving higher productivity and B:C ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
Micro-sprinkler irrigation at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio can be advisable for chickpea cultivation in semi-arid areas.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- micro sprinkler at 0.75 IW/CPE ratioe2
- Outcome
- advisable for chickpea cultivatione2
- Setting
- semi-arid areae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield of chickpea”
e1“Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar (M.S.) India”
e2“The irrigation through micro sprinkler at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio can be advisable for chickpea cultivation in semi-arid area”
Claim · model-written summary
Under water scarcity, micro-sprinkler irrigation at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio is better in practice.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- micro sprinkler at 0.75 IW/CPE ratioe2
- Outcome
- better in practicee2
- Qualifier
- under water scarcity conditione2
- Setting
- Rahurie1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield of chickpea”
e1“Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar (M.S.) India”
e2“under water scarcity condition micro sprinkler at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio better in practice”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
120 papers more in this group
See all 124 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.