Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Summer calcium nitrate reduced bitter pit and storage rots under captan and dinocap.

A claim from The relationship between different spray combinations of certain fungicides with calcium nitrate and the incidence of bitter pit and fungal diseases of apple · 1971

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer calcium nitrate reduced bitter pit and storage rots under captan and dinocap.

Treatment
commercial calcium nitrate (C.C.N.) four times between mid-June and mid-Auguste0
Outcome
incidence of bitter pit and storage rotse0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
trees sprayed with captan and dinocape0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of commercial calcium nitrate (C.C.N.) four times between mid-June and mid-August led to a considerable reduction in the incidence of bitter pit and storage rots in fruits from trees sprayed with captan and dinocap”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–739
t0

“of apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–157

Title

The relationship between different spray combinations of certain fungicides with calcium nitrate and the incidence of bitter pit and fungal diseases of apple

R.O. Sharples; A. H. M. Kirby Journal of Horticultural Science 1971. doi:10.1080/00221589.1971.11514414

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-b3bfe28b529e36ca7dfbb4afd97546fe92164f6037b45f28a30585f479dd6a66 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

calcium nitrate · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.