Intervention effectmodel-written summary

A seeding rate of 160 kg/ha gave the best grain yield in wheat, 578.73 and 516.06 g m-2 at the two locations.

A claim from EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS OF TARZEC AND AXIAL HERBICIDES AND SEEDING RATES ON WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) GROWTH, YIELD, AND WEED CONTROL · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A seeding rate of 160 kg/ha gave the best grain yield in wheat, 578.73 and 516.06 g m-2 at the two locations.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
the seeding rate of 160 kg h1e2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
beste2
Value
578.73, 516.06 g.m2e2
Setting
Al-Jarn village/Nimrud district/Nineveh Governorate and Bartella districte1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the most important cereal crops in the world”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–83
e1

“an experiment was carried out for the agricultural season 2022-2023 in two locations, Al-Jarn village/Nimrud district/Nineveh Governorate and Bartella district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–501
e2

“the seeding rate of 160 kg h1 recorded the best seed rate for the number weight weed, number of weeds, the number grains, the number spikes, and the grain yield amounted to 6.03, 2.05 weed.m2, 3.38, 6.61 g.m2, 38.59, 37.17 grain.spike1, 504.1, 474.1 spike.m2, and 578.73, 516.06 g.m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–956

Title

EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS OF TARZEC AND AXIAL HERBICIDES AND SEEDING RATES ON WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) GROWTH, YIELD, AND WEED CONTROL

Dheyaa Fathi Aljuburi; Moyassar Mohammed Aziz; Ammar Salah Sami; et al. Mağallaẗ zirāʿaẗ al-rāfidayn 2025. doi:10.33899/mja.2025.156328.1522

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-b4b415a4da009aff0b187a0bf1c81f3092590d3ad3cb01b8b3ee0f5cebbebc4a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this claim · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

489 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.