Claim · model-written summary
Girdling of sweet orange branches did not promote flowering on fruit-bearing or non-fruiting branches in the field.
- Taxon
- sweet orange
Citrus sinensise4 - Treatment
- girdling of branchese7
- Outcome
- floweringe7
- Direction
- did not promotee7
- Qualifier
- on either fruit-bearing or non-fruiting branchese7
- Setting
- In the fielde7
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“In the field, Alar (3000 p.p.m.) applied twice or girdling of branches, about the time of flower formation, did not promote flowering on either fruit-bearing or non-fruiting branches”
e4“when applied twice to sweet orange plants”
Title
Promoting flowering in sweet orange
GI Moss Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 1971. doi:10.1071/ar9710625
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Alar at 3000 p.p.m. gave fewer flowers than controls under marginally flower-inducing conditions.
- Intervention effect Hyvar-X at 783 p.p.m. gave fewer flowers than controls under marginally flower-inducing conditions.
- Intervention effect Alar had no significant effect on flower numbers of fruit-bearing or non-fruiting sweet orange under flower-inducing conditions.
- Intervention effect Hyvar-X had no significant effect on flower numbers of fruit-bearing or non-fruiting sweet orange under flower-inducing conditions.
- Intervention effect Alar at 3000 p.p.m. applied twice did not promote flowering on fruit-bearing or non-fruiting sweet orange branches in the field.