Intervention effectmodel-written summary

ZnSO4 seed priming improved chickpea growth.

A claim from SEED PRIMING WITH ZINC MODULATE GROWTH, PIGMENTS AND YIELD OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.) UNDER WATER DEFICIT CONDITIONS · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSO4 seed priming improved chickpea growth.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
seed priming with ZnSO4e0
Outcome
growth conditionse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the seed priming with ZnSO4 improved the growth conditions of the plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1065
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–91

Title

SEED PRIMING WITH ZINC MODULATE GROWTH, PIGMENTS AND YIELD OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.) UNDER WATER DEFICIT CONDITIONS

A MAHMOOD; H KANWAL; A KAUSAR; et al. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 2019. doi:10.15666/aeer/1701_147160

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-b5e32097a90e5dec32142060f798d8c65b897fe3c53f981c0ec967dedd46ed01 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

81 papers: 76 positive, 5 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.