Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pre-sowing seed treatment had no significant effect on field germination of chickpea

A claim from THE INFLUENCE OF TECHNOLOGICAL METHODS OF GROWING ON FIELD SIMILARITY AND SURVIVAL OF CHICKPEAS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE RIGHT BANK FOREST STEPPE OF UKRAINE · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-sowing seed treatment had no significant effect on field germination of chickpea

Taxon
CHICKPEASt0
Treatment
pre-sowing seed treatmente4
Outcome
field germinatione5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“CHICKPEAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95
e4

“the effect of pre-sowing seed treatment on the studied indicator is not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–973
e5

“Based on the analysis of the obtained indicators of field germination of seeds of chickpea varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–870

Title

THE INFLUENCE OF TECHNOLOGICAL METHODS OF GROWING ON FIELD SIMILARITY AND SURVIVAL OF CHICKPEAS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE RIGHT BANK FOREST STEPPE OF UKRAINE

Viktor Mazur; Hanna Pantsyreva; Myroslava Mordvaniuk; et al. Agriculture and Forestry 2021. doi:10.37128/2707-5826-2021-3-1

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-fbea048333b854129b5ac33b556b35792cee726e18e29d5a1c6810547d75581a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

seed treatment · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

81 papers: 76 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 76 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Seed priming brought faster emergence and better stands across the three crops.

    ON-FARM SEED PRIMING IN SEMI-ARID AGRICULTURE: DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION IN MAIZE, RICE AND CHICKPEA IN INDIA USING PARTICIPATORY METHODS · 1999

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Priming increased plant stand and accelerated crop maturity.

    SHORT DURATION CHICKPEA TO REPLACE FALLOW AFTER AMAN RICE: THE ROLE OF ON-FARM SEED PRIMING IN THE HIGH BARIND TRACT OF BANGLADESH · 2001

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Hydropriming and osmopriming induced faster chickpea germination than unprimed seeds

    Hydro- and osmopriming improve chickpea germination · 2006 · compared with unprimed seeds

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Seed priming increased seedling emergence by 21%.

    Response of Chickpea to Seed Priming in the High Barind Tract of Bangladesh · 1999

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Seed priming with 0.001 M Zn decreased the mean germination/emergence time of chickpea compared with non-primed seeds.

    Zinc seed priming improves stand establishment, tissue zinc concentration and early seedling growth of chickpea. · 2019 · compared with non-primed seeds

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Seed coating at 5 mg Zn kg-1 improved chickpea emergence or germination rates and indices.

    Zinc Seed Coating Improves Emergence and Seedling Growth in Desi and Kabuli Chickpea Types but Shows Toxicity at Higher Concentration · 2025

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Seed treatment with T. viride and T. harzianum increased seed germination compared with control.

    Comparative efficacy of Trichoderma viride and Trichoderma harzianum against Fusarium oxysporum f sp. ciceris causing wilt of chickpea · 2013 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Fenamiphos seed treatment increased dry weight by 14%.

    EFFECT OF SEED TREATMENT WITH CERTAIN BIOPESTICIDES ON ROOT-KNOT OF CHICKPEA · 2005

    Opposite direction

72 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.