Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seed priming with 0.001 M Zn decreased the mean germination/emergence time of chickpea compared with non-primed seeds.

A claim from Zinc seed priming improves stand establishment, tissue zinc concentration and early seedling growth of chickpea. · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming with 0.001 M Zn decreased the mean germination/emergence time of chickpea compared with non-primed seeds.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
seed priming with 0.001 M Zne2
Outcome
mean germination/emergencetimee2
Direction
decreasede2
Comparator
non-primed seedse1
Setting
petri plates and sand filled potse2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“early seedling growth of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–111
e1

“taking non-primed seeds as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1127
e2

“seed priming with 0.001 M Zn decreased mean germination/emergencetime, improvedthe seedling root(47.8 and 30.4%)and shoot length (27.1 and 10.9%),number of secondary roots(80.0 and 28.6%),seedling dry weight (25.5 and 42.5%) and seedling Zn concentration(30.3 and 47.2%),respectively in petri plates and sand filled pots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1654

Title

Zinc seed priming improves stand establishment, tissue zinc concentration and early seedling growth of chickpea.

Aman Ullah; Muhammad Farooq; Mubshar Hussain; et al. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) 2019

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e3eb0a21ed9aa30067a7cfc80bee10d6944bc3b1b2e3fb6661111d320a5fe9a5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

38 papers: 35 positive, 3 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

81 papers: 76 positive, 5 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.