Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Paclobutrazol increased mango panicle length and breadth at full bloom stage.

A claim from Flowering and Production Improvement Studies of Mango cv. Banganpalli in Relation to Plant Growth Regulators and Chemicals · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paclobutrazol increased mango panicle length and breadth at full bloom stage.

Material
cv. Banganpallie0
Organ / stage
full bloom stagee1
Treatment
paclobutrazol (3ml.m-1 of canopy diameter)e1
Outcome
panicle length and breadthe1
Direction
increasese1
Setting
Fruit research station, Sangareddye0

Not reportedGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Fruit research station, Sangareddy to study the influence of flower enhancing plant growth regulators and fruit set improving chemicals on mango cv. Banganpalli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–218
e1

“Trees applied with paclobutrazol (3ml.m-1 of canopy diameter) alone significantly increases percent flowering (25% over control), panicle length and breadth at the time off full bloom stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–409

Title

Flowering and Production Improvement Studies of Mango cv. Banganpalli in Relation to Plant Growth Regulators and Chemicals

Golla Vijay Krishna; A. Bhagwa; M. Raj; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2017. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608.063

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-b6f3ef482447ec796797748580834090894978a087bc690e1c05d285c2a75d42 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

paclobutrazol · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.