Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same treatment gave the highest water use efficiency (25.87 kg/ha/mm) of chickpea compared with other treatments.

A claim from Effect of soil and foliar application of nutrients and use of PSB on yield and water productivity of chickpea under rainfed conditions of eastern Uttar Pradesh · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave the highest water use efficiency (25.87 kg/ha/mm) of chickpea compared with other treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Treatment
Application of 100 kg DAP/ha as basal + 2 sprays of 2% ZnSO4/ha at 25 & 45 DASe1
Outcome
water use efficiencye1
Direction
higheste1
Value
25.87 kg/ha/mme1
Comparator
other treatmentse1
Setting
Agronomy Research Farm of ANDUA&T, Ayodhyae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2020-21 and 2021-22 at Agronomy Research Farm of ANDUA&T, Ayodhya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–128
e1

“Application of 100 kg DAP/ha as basal + 2 sprays of 2% ZnSO4/ha at 25 & 45 DAS resulted in highest seed yield (22.73 q/ha), straw yield (34.16 q/ha), consumptive use (124.05 mm), water use efficiency (25.87 kg/ha/mm) and B:C ratio of 3.03 compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–545
e2

“yield and water productivity of chickpea under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–276

Title

Effect of soil and foliar application of nutrients and use of PSB on yield and water productivity of chickpea under rainfed conditions of eastern Uttar Pradesh

Atish Yadav; Divya Singh; Anil Kumar Singh Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development 2023. doi:10.5958/2231-6701.2023.00012.7

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-b739caebf39b1bf857f82d431720f7a2137c1b851fd9bdd4c8e306ffb6643b20 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.