Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 100 kg DAP/ha basal plus two 2% ZnSO4 sprays treatment gave the highest chickpea seed yield (22.73 q/ha) compared with other treatments.

A claim from Effect of soil and foliar application of nutrients and use of PSB on yield and water productivity of chickpea under rainfed conditions of eastern Uttar Pradesh · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100 kg DAP/ha basal plus two 2% ZnSO4 sprays treatment gave the highest chickpea seed yield (22.73 q/ha) compared with other treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Treatment
Application of 100 kg DAP/ha as basal + 2 sprays of 2% ZnSO4/ha at 25 & 45 DASe1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
22.73 q/hae1
Comparator
other treatmentse1
Setting
Agronomy Research Farm of ANDUA&T, Ayodhyae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2020-21 and 2021-22 at Agronomy Research Farm of ANDUA&T, Ayodhya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–128
e1

“Application of 100 kg DAP/ha as basal + 2 sprays of 2% ZnSO4/ha at 25 & 45 DAS resulted in highest seed yield (22.73 q/ha), straw yield (34.16 q/ha), consumptive use (124.05 mm), water use efficiency (25.87 kg/ha/mm) and B:C ratio of 3.03 compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–545
e2

“yield and water productivity of chickpea under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–276

Title

Effect of soil and foliar application of nutrients and use of PSB on yield and water productivity of chickpea under rainfed conditions of eastern Uttar Pradesh

Atish Yadav; Divya Singh; Anil Kumar Singh Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development 2023. doi:10.5958/2231-6701.2023.00012.7

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-2c8f8659235f0db00e83064f230a2c2bab6174599d3ca48083536b8685335f9a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

34 papers: 33 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

177 papers: 173 positive, 4 negative or no effect

172 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

168 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.