Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The authors conclude that the priming treatments improve onion seed performance and plant growth.

A claim from 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics Reveal Enhancement of Growth-Promoting Metabolites in Onion Seedlings Treated with Green-Synthesized Nanomaterials · 2020

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the priming treatments improve onion seed performance and plant growth.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
these priming treatmentse0
Outcome
seed performance and plant growthe0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these priming treatments have positive impact on improving seed performance and plant growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1459
t0

“Onion Seedlings Treated with Green-Synthesized Nanomaterials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–220

Title

1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics Reveal Enhancement of Growth-Promoting Metabolites in Onion Seedlings Treated with Green-Synthesized Nanomaterials

Pratibha Acharya; Guddadarangavvanahally K. Jayaprakasha; James Semper; et al. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2020. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.0c00817

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-b76c2a0d49fdcb484eb385da16edd5b13e2e252f14eb45c4c0b20a77d5429e90 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

seed treatment · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

46 papers: 39 positive, 7 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.