Claim · model-written summary
Potassium recovery rates differed across soil textures.
- Taxon
- wine-grapes
Vitis viniferae1 - Outcome
- potassium recovery ratee0
- Setting
- different soile0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The sequence of potassium recovery rate in different soil is as follows: sand-loamfine-sandcoarse-sand.”
e1“wine-grapes grown on aeolian sandy soil in Ningxia”
Title
Liang Jinxiu 2003
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Slow release and available potassium contents in the vineyard soil were low.
- Association Available potassium increased as potash application rose.
- Association Fixed potassium increased as potash application rose.
- Observation Slow release potassium replenished depleted available potassium.
- Observation Slow release potassium was also exhausted.
- Observation Soil potassium buffering capacity was low.
- Association Potassium content in grape grains and plants increased with applied K.
- Observation High fertility soil supplied potassium better than low fertility soil.
- Observation Potassium recovery rate was high in high fertility soil.
- Association Potassium nutrition affected grape growth and quality.