Intervention effectmodel-written summary

P fertilization did not similarly affect tissue P content.

A claim from [Responses of rice (Oryza sativa) growth and its C, N and P composition to FACE (free-air carbon dioxide enrichment) and N, P fertilization]. · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilization did not similarly affect tissue P content.

Treatment
P fertilizatione0
Outcome
tissue P contente0
Direction
no such effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no such effect of P fertilization on tissue P content was found.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1356
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–110

Title

[Responses of rice (Oryza sativa) growth and its C, N and P composition to FACE (free-air carbon dioxide enrichment) and N, P fertilization].

Zubin Xie; Jianguo Zhu; Yali Zhang; et al. PubMed 2002

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-b9682f8698014e1ba252ab550e3cb67883a8c7f0943c6fc606ccf9c9833fee0d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 17 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this claim · 932 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

984 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.