Claim · model-written summary
Nano zinc and iron treatments did not affect available soil zinc and iron.
- Taxon
- cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatae1 - Treatment
- application of zinc and Fe through mNs and rGOe0
- Outcome
- Available zinc and iron in soile0
- Direction
- unaffectede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Available zinc and iron in soil was unaffected by application of zinc and Fe through mNs and rGO in crops”
e1“nutrients content and uptake by cabbage and cauliflower”
Title
K. Himani; Shri Ram; Shubham A. Durgude Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 2022. doi:10.9734/ajsspn/2022/v8i3159
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect The mNs T6 foliar treatment increased cabbage economic and biological yields over conventional and control treatments.
- Intervention effect The rGO T8 foliar treatment increased cauliflower economic and biological yields over conventional and control treatments.
- Intervention effect Increasing mNs nano zinc and iron doses increased cabbage nutrient content and uptake over control.
- Intervention effect Increasing mNs nano zinc and iron doses increased cauliflower nutrient content and uptake over control.
- Intervention effect Increasing rGO nano zinc and iron doses reduced cabbage nutrient content and uptake.
- Intervention effect Increasing rGO nano zinc and iron doses reduced cauliflower nutrient content and uptake.
- Intervention effect The rGO T8 treatment increased cabbage head iron, zinc, protein and phenol content over control.
- Intervention effect The mNs T6 treatment increased cauliflower curd iron, zinc, protein and phenol content over control.