Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation intervals significantly affected plant height and leaf number at ripening, and dry weight and leaf area at two stages; 21-day irrigation gave the greatest values.

A claim from EFFECT OF SOWING DATE AND IRRIGATION INTERVALS ON GROWTH CHARACTERS OF SOME WHEAT CULTIVARS. · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation intervals significantly affected plant height and leaf number at ripening, and dry weight and leaf area at two stages; 21-day irrigation gave the greatest values.

Organ / stage
ripping stagee0
Treatment
irrigation every 21 dayse0
Outcome
plant height and number ofleaf per plante0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
irrigation intervalse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the other hand, significant differenceswere observed among irrigation intervals for plant height and number ofleaf per plant at ripping stage, while dry weight per plant and leaves area/plant at two growth stages. Moreover the greatest value were obtained byirrigation every 21 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1212
t0

“WHEAT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–91

Title

EFFECT OF SOWING DATE AND IRRIGATION INTERVALS ON GROWTH CHARACTERS OF SOME WHEAT CULTIVARS.

F. s.Abd-El-Samie; Ekram. A.Migawer; A. M.A.El-Sherif; et al. Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development /Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development 2016. doi:10.21608/fjard.2016.191750

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-bbb5c465876080071de546a03b8133e3759889f713bafe6123107fac0acf8dc2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.