Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Deep urea placement increased nitrogen recovery efficiency by 0.9–16.7% in dry and normal years.

A claim from Optimizing urea deep placement to rainfall can maximize crop water-nitrogen productivity and decrease nitrate leaching in winter wheat · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep urea placement increased nitrogen recovery efficiency by 0.9–16.7% in dry and normal years.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
deep urea placemente0
Outcome
N recovery efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.9–16.7 %e0
Qualifier
dry and normal yearse0
Comparator
D5e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with D5, deep urea placement significantly increased the crop N uptake (10.4–27.6 %), grain N content (1.2–18.7 %), N recovery efficiency (NRE, 0.9–16.7 %) and N partial productivity (PFPN, 1.1–20.0 %) in dry and normal years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–1084
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134

Title

Optimizing urea deep placement to rainfall can maximize crop water-nitrogen productivity and decrease nitrate leaching in winter wheat

Yingxin Wang; Qin Guo; Yirui Xu; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2022. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107971

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-bbf1e2f35233be0de0f34534b296e80211c58789694dddfcc4df5897ba302ca8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

174 papers: 127 positive, 47 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this claim · 45 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

165 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.