Intervention effectmodel-written summary

More tillers responded to GA3 with fully emerged ears at higher density.

A claim from The effect of sowing density and application of gibberellic acid on male sterility and ear emergence in ethephon‐treated field‐grown wheat · 1978

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More tillers responded to GA3 with fully emerged ears at higher density.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
Increased sowing densitye1
Outcome
proportion of tillers responding to GA 3 by having fully emerged earse0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulted in a larger proportion of tillers responding to GA 3 by having fully emerged ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–608
e1

“Increased sowing density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–272
e2

“winter wheat cv. Maris Nimrod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 160–189

Title

The effect of sowing density and application of gibberellic acid on male sterility and ear emergence in ethephon‐treated field‐grown wheat

W. G. HUGHES; J. J. BODDEN; STELLA GALANOPOULOU Annals of Applied Biology 1978. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1978.tb00712.x

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-bc2677fe2c5e4657876ceec12f73f7931f6bddbefdbc2931e9ee0ef92f7354f7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this claim · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

489 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.