Intervention effectmodel-written summary

I2 irrigation significantly increased wheat straw yield over I0 and equaled I3.

A claim from Yield, nitrogen-use efficiency, and distribution of nitrate-nitrogen in the soil profile as influenced by irrigation and fertilizer nitrogen levels under zero-till wheat in the eastern Indo-Gangetic plains of India · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

I2 irrigation significantly increased wheat straw yield over I0 and equaled I3.

Treatment
irrigation level-I 2e0
Outcome
straw yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
I 0e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and straw yields were significantly higher at the irrigation level-I 2 and 120 kg N ha −1 -N 2 over the control (I 0 and N 0 ) and were at par with the highest applied levels of irrigation and N (I 3 and N 3 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1098
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 164–169

Title

Yield, nitrogen-use efficiency, and distribution of nitrate-nitrogen in the soil profile as influenced by irrigation and fertilizer nitrogen levels under zero-till wheat in the eastern Indo-Gangetic plains of India

Samaresh Sahoo; P. Mukhopadhyay; A. K. Sinha; et al. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2022. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.970017

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-bc3f4dfde331f332bb8692bfe84b9456210a3036a82a71f7464216c1cc4c3dd2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.