Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At elevated CO2 (1000 ppm), shoot dry biomass of wheat increased in all silicon treatments, highest at 1.5 mM Si (0.81 g plant-1), compared with ambient CO2.

A claim from Silicon enhances carbon bio-sequestration in wheat under elevated CO₂ · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At elevated CO2 (1000 ppm), shoot dry biomass of wheat increased in all silicon treatments, highest at 1.5 mM Si (0.81 g plant-1), compared with ambient CO2.

Organ / stage
shoote1
Treatment
eCO₂e1
Outcome
shoot dry biomasse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
0.81 g plant⁻¹e1
Comparator
aCO₂e2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat under elevated CO₂”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–69
e1

“At eCO₂, shoot dry biomass increased in all treatments, with the highest value (0.81 g plant⁻¹) recorded at 1.5 mM Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1169
e2

“Parallel treatments were implemented at ambient CO₂ levels (aCO₂; approximately 400 ppm), using the same Si treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–865

Title

Silicon enhances carbon bio-sequestration in wheat under elevated CO₂

Dubljanin, Tijana; Pavlović, Jelena; Kostić, Igor; et al. Omorika - Repository of the Faculty of Forestry, Belgrade 2025

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-bc79d758407d13aa1f430fa79ee22454798c3b197d37dd7f78b7a419da888165 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

co2 · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 124 positive, 21 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

136 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.