Paper · 2025 · Omorika - Repository of the Faculty of Forestry, Belgrade

Silicon enhances carbon bio-sequestration in wheat under elevated CO₂

Dubljanin, Tijana; Pavlović, Jelena; Kostić, Igor; et al.

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) is the most significant greenhouse gas contributing to globalwarming. According to high-emission scenarios, CO₂ concentrations may exceed 1000 ppm by 2100 and rise above 2000 ppm by 2250. Carbon (C) occluded within phytoliths (PhytOC) is highly resistant to decomposition and can remain in soils for a long time. Since PhytOC originates from atmospheric CO₂ fixed through photosynthesis, it represents a potential long-term C sink. To investigate the C biosequestration potential of wheat, a hydroponic experiment was conducted under controlled environmental conditions. The study combined elevated CO₂ (eCO₂; 1000 ppm) with two silicon (Si) concentrations (0.5 mM and 1.5 mM H₄SiO₄), alongside a Si-free control. Parallel treatments were implemented at ambient CO₂ levels (aCO₂; approximately 400 ppm), using the same Si treatments. This experimental setup enabled assessment of the interactive effects of CO₂ enrichment and Si supply on wheat growth and its capacity for carbon stabilization via phytolith formation. At eCO₂, shoot dry biomass increased in all treatments, with the highest value (0.81 g plant⁻¹) recorded at 1.5 mM Si. Silicon supply enhanced total plant Si content across both CO₂ regimes. Silicon supply did not affect the maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fm/Fv) indicating undisturbed photosynthetic performance. However, C concentration in shoot tissue slightly decreased with higher Si, possibly due to a dilution effect or changes in C allocation. The combination of Si addition and elevated CO₂ concentration significantly increased phytolith formation and PhytOC accumulation in wheat, whereas no detectable phytoliths were found in plants grown without Si supply. However, the C concentration in phytoliths was lower in the 1.5 mM Si treatment than in the 0.5 mM Si treatment under both aCO₂ and eCO₂ conditions. The C/N ratio in phytoliths also decreased with increasing Si supply and was consistently lower under eCO₂ compared to aCO₂. Nevertheless, the highest PhytOC content (1.15 mg plant⁻¹) was observed at eCO₂ with 1.5 mM Si, approximately 50% more than in the same Si treatment at aCO₂. These findings indicate that Si supply at elevated CO₂ levels not only enhances Si accumulation and phytolith-based C sequestration but also promotes greater biomass production and physiological performance. This highlights the potential of Si fertilisation in climate-resilient crop cultivation and long-term atmospheric CO₂ mitigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At elevated CO2 (1000 ppm), shoot dry biomass of wheat increased in all silicon treatments, highest at 1.5 mM Si (0.81 g plant-1), compared with ambient CO2.

Organ / stage
shoote1
Treatment
eCO₂e1
Outcome
shoot dry biomasse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
0.81 g plant⁻¹e1
Comparator
aCO₂e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat under elevated CO₂”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“At eCO₂, shoot dry biomass increased in all treatments, with the highest value (0.81 g plant⁻¹) recorded at 1.5 mM Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1169 · show in text ↑
e2

“Parallel treatments were implemented at ambient CO₂ levels (aCO₂; approximately 400 ppm), using the same Si treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supply enhanced total plant Si content in wheat across both CO2 regimes, compared with a Si-free control.

Treatment
Silicon supplye1
Outcome
total plant Si contente1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
Si-free controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat under elevated CO₂”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Silicon supply enhanced total plant Si content across both CO₂ regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1241 · show in text ↑
e2

“alongside a Si-free control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supply did not affect the maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fm/Fv) in wheat.

Treatment
Silicon supplye1
Outcome
maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fm/Fv)e1
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat under elevated CO₂”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Silicon supply did not affect the maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fm/Fv) indicating undisturbed photosynthetic performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot C concentration in wheat slightly decreased with higher silicon supply, possibly due to dilution or changes in C allocation.

Organ / stage
shoot tissuee1
Treatment
higher Sie1
Outcome
C concentration in shoot tissuee1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
possibly due to a dilution effect or changes in C allocatione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat under elevated CO₂”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“C concentration in shoot tissue slightly decreased with higher Si, possibly due to a dilution effect or changes in C allocation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of Si addition and elevated CO2 significantly increased phytolith formation and PhytOC accumulation in wheat.

Treatment
Si addition and elevated CO₂ concentratione1
Outcome
phytolith formation and PhytOC accumulatione1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The combination of Si addition and elevated CO₂ concentration significantly increased phytolith formation and PhytOC accumulation in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No detectable phytoliths were found in wheat grown without Si supply.

Treatment
Si supplye1
Outcome
detectable phytolithse1
Comparator
without Si supplye1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat under elevated CO₂”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas no detectable phytoliths were found in plants grown without Si supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The C concentration in phytoliths was lower at 1.5 mM Si than at 0.5 mM Si under both aCO2 and eCO2.

Treatment
1.5 mM Sie1
Outcome
C concentration in phytolithse1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
0.5 mM Si treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat under elevated CO₂”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“the C concentration in phytoliths was lower in the 1.5 mM Si treatment than in the 0.5 mM Si treatment under both aCO₂ and eCO₂ conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The C/N ratio in phytoliths decreased with increasing silicon supply.

Treatment
increasing Si supplye1
Outcome
C/N ratio in phytolithse1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat under elevated CO₂”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“The C/N ratio in phytoliths also decreased with increasing Si supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–1955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The C/N ratio in phytoliths was lower under eCO2 than under aCO2.

Treatment
eCO₂e2
Outcome
C/N ratio in phytolithse1
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
aCO₂e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat under elevated CO₂”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“The C/N ratio in phytoliths also decreased with increasing Si supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–1955 · show in text ↑
e2

“was consistently lower under eCO₂ compared to aCO₂”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1960–2010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest PhytOC content in wheat (1.15 mg plant-1) was observed at eCO2 with 1.5 mM Si.

Treatment
eCO₂ with 1.5 mM Sie1
Outcome
PhytOC contente1
Direction
higheste1
Value
1.15 mg plant⁻¹e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat under elevated CO₂”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest PhytOC content (1.15 mg plant⁻¹) was observed at eCO₂ with 1.5 mM Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2026–2106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PhytOC content at eCO2 with 1.5 mM Si was approximately 50% higher than in the same Si treatment at aCO2.

Treatment
eCO₂ with 1.5 mM Sie1
Outcome
PhytOC contente1
Direction
moree2
Value
approximately 50%e2
Comparator
the same Si treatment at aCO₂e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat under elevated CO₂”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest PhytOC content (1.15 mg plant⁻¹) was observed at eCO₂ with 1.5 mM Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2026–2106 · show in text ↑
e2

“approximately 50% more than in the same Si treatment at aCO₂”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2108–2168 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilisation has potential in climate-resilient wheat cultivation.

Outcome
Si fertilisation in climate-resilient crop cultivatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat under elevated CO₂”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“This highlights the potential of Si fertilisation in climate-resilient crop cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2378–2465 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 26 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

silicon atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 32 positive, 2 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 58 positive, 3 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 23 positive, 17 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

co2 · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 124 positive, 21 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.