Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nano-Si application significantly increased grain yield by 9.5% above the control.

A claim from Effects of Silicon and Zinc Nanoparticles on Growth, Yield, and Biochemical Characteristics of Rice · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-Si application significantly increased grain yield by 9.5% above the control.

Treatment
nano‐Sie1
Outcome
GYe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
9.5e1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
two experimental farms (Mazandaran, Iran)e2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Application of nano‐Zn, nano‐Si, soil‐Zn, and soil‐Si significantly increased GY by 12.6, 9.5, 9.2, and 6.9%, respectively, above the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1112
e2

“two experimental farms (Mazandaran, Iran)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–745
t0

“Characteristics of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–99

Title

Effects of Silicon and Zinc Nanoparticles on Growth, Yield, and Biochemical Characteristics of Rice

Norollah Kheyri; Hossein Ajam Norouzi; Hamid Reza Mobasser; et al. Agronomy Journal 2019. doi:10.2134/agronj2019.04.0304

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-bd6794fb6f6d788954ed85aff6d3d6b448cff40a8196042e89c7d631aea06d50 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 189 positive, 13 negative or no effect

188 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

193 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.