Intervention effectmodel-written summary

IWM-IWM improved soil CO 2 and dehydrogenase activity relative to RH-RH sequences.

A claim from Effect of Tillage and Weed Control Methods in Maize (Zea mays) -Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cropping System · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IWM-IWM improved soil CO 2 and dehydrogenase activity relative to RH-RH sequences.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
IWM-IWMe2
Outcome
soil CO 2 and dehydrogenase activitye2
Direction
improvede2
Comparator
RH-RH sequencese2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–62
e2

“IWM-IWM improved soil CO 2 and dehydrogenase activity than RH-RH sequences from their initial values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1516

Title

Effect of Tillage and Weed Control Methods in Maize (Zea mays) -Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cropping System

Dept. of Agronomy, BAU, Ranchi, Jharkhand (834 006), India; R. R. Upasani; Sheela Barla; et al. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 2017. doi:10.23910/ijbsm/2017.8.6.3c0156

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-be52ec5c13cc2db8d2a82eecbbd72d9d7419bb00c51e07147e9b41b9090b1577 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

Triticum aestivum · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.